It is the number one topic for the last two days in the tech blogosphere. Microsoft changed some files on Windows XP and Vista machines via Windows Update without asking for permission. Nate Clinton, product manager Windows Update, meanwhile tried to clarify this incident in the Microsoft Update Product Team Blog. In my view, his explanation is not plausible.

Latest posts by Michael Pietroforte (see all)

If I understood it right, then his main point is that Windows Update itself had to be updated to work properly in the future. But this doesn't explain at all why users haven't been notified in advance about this. If Microsoft can replace system files, then it should also be possible to notify users about the update.

It is not that I mistrust Microsoft. Of course, I would always let them update Windows. These are just bad manners. I simply want to know if something will be changed on my PC and if it is only because it would help me pin down the cause of system problems later.

Subscribe to 4sysops newsletter!

I really don't understand why Microsoft is so insensitive about such issues. Some people think that Microsoft is only successful because of their marketing. I wonder, however, how it is possible that a company with such a bad image can survive at all. It must have something to do with their products.

1 Comment
  1. Lukas Beeler 16 years ago

    I’ve known and worked with WU auto update since i’ve first touched SUS – it’s astonishing that this got such widespread publicity.

Leave a reply

Please enclose code in pre tags

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


© 4sysops 2006 - 2023


Please ask IT administration questions in the forums. Any other messages are welcome.


Log in with your credentials


Forgot your details?

Create Account