Robert L. Mitchel wrote an interesting article about the virtualization technology in Windows Server Longhorn. I've read several times that Longhorn will come with its own hypervisor, which always confused me. I didn't understand how a typical guest operating system can have a hypervisor because I thought a hypervisor is just some kind of an OS.

Michael Pietroforte

Michael Pietroforte is the founder and editor of 4sysops. He is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional (MVP) with more than 30 years of experience in IT management and system administration.

For me, a hypervisor was just a piece for software that runs directly on hardware partitioning CPUs, memory, etc. for guest operating systems. The only difference to a typical OS is that it runs other operating systems instead of applications. Well, I just learned that this only is half the truth.

Longhorn's hypervisor still needs an instance of Windows Server running in the parent partition. However, Windows Server will run "on top" rather than underneath of the hypervisor. This basically seems to mean that the hypervisor just utilizes the device drivers of Windows Server. If I understand it right, then this is what is meant by the term "built-in-hypervisor".

I also recommend reading the third comment of the article. An anonymous reader goes into more details there. If what "she" says is correct, then VMware ESX Server works in a similar way, just that it runs a light version of Red Hat Linux in the parent partition. This is similar to Longhorn's hypervisor as it only needs Server Core which can also be considered as a light version of Windows Server Longhorn.

Win the monthly 4sysops member prize for IT pros

Share
0

Related Posts

2 Comments
  1. TJB 11 years ago

    The comment about ESX Server is correct. There is a common misconception that ESX is a customised version of RedHat. The VMKernal is actually completely proprietary, however the Service Console used to configure and manage ESX happens to be a VM running an modified version of Red Hat 7.2. I would assume that Longhorn Server is very similar in that it wouldn't make sense to bloat the Hypervisior with Service Console type functionality, it makes more sense to use a host OS to carry out that task. It's interesting that the implication there is that all Longhorn servers are effectively VM's.

    0

  2. Michael Pietroforte 11 years ago

    Thanks! Things are getting clearer.

    0

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CONTACT US

Please ask IT administration questions in the forum. Any other messages are welcome.

Sending
© 4sysops 2006 - 2018

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account