I admit that I was wrong. When Nadella took over, I predicted that Microsoft will dump Nokia in less than a year. But less than 15 months is quite okay, too. Google needed 19 months with Motorola. So Microsoft just beat Google.
Latest posts by Michael Pietroforte (see all)

Strictly speaking, Microsoft didn’t dump Nokia because Microsoft only acquired its mobile phone business. Nokia still exists as a company, and they will build phones again. I wonder how many of the 7,800 employees that Nadella just disconnected from Microsoft will go back to their former employer.

Microsoft disconnects Nokia

Microsoft disconnects Nokia

Considering that Microsoft will continue to build phones, some people might argue that Microsoft is still a mobile phone maker. Writing off the $7.6 billion could be seen as a mere accounting issue. However, these layoffs essentially mean that Microsoft is no longer a real phone vendor, in the same sense that Microsoft is not a computer maker (even though, in contrast to Lumia phones, the Surface is doing quite well).

The devices that Redmond builds can be seen as templates for real hardware makers to demonstrate the potential of Microsoft’s operating systems. Microsoft is no longer a devices company. And that’s good. It is safe to say that Ballmer’s Nokia deal is the worst fiasco in the history of the computer industry. Google could at least sell Motorola to Lenovo. Microsoft can’t do anything other than dispose of Ballmer’s favorite toy.

Nadella’s email is an excellent piece of philosophical write-up. Jut like the great philosophers inspired generations of students to ask what the grandmaster wanted to tell us, computer journalists around the planet are now trying to interpret Nadella’s highly abstract text. And just as the great philosophers themselves often didn’t really know what their work actually means, I believe there is no hidden message in Nadella’s letter.

Some journalists speculated that Microsoft will now focus on the business side of IT and further abandon the consumer market. I doubt that this will happen. When Nadella took over with the blessings of Bill Gates, it was clear that Microsoft will return to its roots and become a company that focuses on building software for all major platforms. During the Gates era, it never really mattered for Microsoft if its clients were consumers or businesses or whether its software ran on a Microsoft OS or not.

The only real difference today is that software is no longer sold; we rent software. But the licensing terms don’t define a company. Microsoft is no longer a devices company and it never was a services company. Microsoft is a company that creates software for microcomputers.

What does this all mean for the IT pro? The fact that Microsoft is releasing Office 2016 for the Mac before Windows demonstrates that Nadella is deemphasizing not only hardware but also Windows. If you are at home in the Windows world, you should start deemphasizing as well. We now live in a heterogeneous IT world. The camp fights of the Ballmer era are over. Thus, you should no longer limit yourself to a brand or platform.

  1. Avatar
    RandyB 8 years ago

    “The camp fights of the Ballmer era are over.”

    Tell that to the ABM (Anything But Microsoft) forces that still infect the IT world.

  2. Avatar

    Didn’t I just do that? 😉

  3. Avatar
    Anthony 8 years ago

    True but it’s still damn easy to deploy, update, and manage Windows systems. Microsoft got really good at that in the past decade with System Center and now with Azure.

  4. Avatar

    Anthony, is that so? In my view deploying and managing Windows has become ridiculously complex. Nowadays, admins even have to be developers (or devops) to master Windows. I think an OS such as Chrome OS or Android that doesn’t have to be deployed or licensed has a “genuine advantage” here. Lets’s hope that the industry allows to play a little longer with PowerShell and all those nice management tools because it is so much fun and turns us IT pros into real heroes. 😉

  5. Avatar
    victor ji 8 years ago

    Though maybe the strategy is right to Microsoft, I really disappointed to Nadella’s decision: That means we will never see the next generation or the next next generation smartphones with Microsoft logo. right???

  6. Avatar

    Victor, Microsoft will still produce phones. However, they will just focus on a few high-end models

Leave a reply to Michael Pietroforte (Rank 4) Click here to cancel the reply

Please enclose code in pre tags

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


© 4sysops 2006 - 2023


Please ask IT administration questions in the forums. Any other messages are welcome.


Log in with your credentials


Forgot your details?

Create Account