smartuac-logo Smart UAC is a free tool that replaces Vista’s UAC (User Account Control). It allows you to mark certain programs as safe, so you won’t be bothered with UAC prompts anymore in the future. You can also add applications to a deny list which will prevent them from being executed. Furthermore, Smart UAC has a built-in malware scanner.

Latest posts by Michael Pietroforte (see all)

One of the features that’s missing with Vista’s UAC is the ability to disable UAC prompts for particular applications. Sometimes you have to configure a Vista feature that requires admin privileges several times because you want to try out something. That’s when UAC can really get on your nerves. Even more annoying are auto-starting apps that initiate a UAC prompt whenever you boot up. Why should I need to confirm that a program is trustworthy more than once?

Like Vista UAC, Smart UAC will prompt for consent whenever you launch a program that needs administrator rights. However, it uses other heuristics than Vista UAC. When I tried the tool, I encountered several UAC alerts that were caused by Windows programs that wouldn’t have been displayed with Vista UAC.

smart-uac-promptThe main difference, however, is that Smart UAC’s dialog window offers two additional options: “Always allow every action of this program” and “Always deny every action of this program.” Smart UAC also has an allow list and a deny list which can be edited manually. Note that you have to always click on “Cancel” if you don’t want the program to start, even though you want to add it to the deny list.

smart-uac-allow-listUnfortunately, the deny option didn’t work when I tested the tool. Smart UAC correctly added the program to the deny list. But the application was then treated as if it were in the allow list, i.e., no prompts were issued and the program started with administrator privileges. Perhaps the error was related to my test environment. Please let me know whether you also experience this problem. The allow option worked fine, though. It certainly is the more important feature. I mean, if you don’t want a program to start, I’d suggest not clicking it. 😉

The built-in malware scanner is supposed to detect 400,000 threats. It makes sense to combine UAC with malware protection. In a certain sense, UAC is just a dumb anti-malware scanner. Almost all of its alerts are false positives. But what do all these prompts mean if you click on “Continue” and the program contains a virus?

Even though Smart UAC seems to be a bit unreliable to me, the idea behind the program makes a lot of sense. I wish Microsoft would add similar features to Windows 7 UAC, but I’m afraid my wish won’t come true.

Next I will publish a review of Symantec’s UAC extension. Stay tuned!

Subscribe to 4sysops newsletter!

Smart UAC

  1. Avatar
    Christopher 15 years ago

    This is a very interesting post. I prefer the UAC concept but it’s such a pain that I diable this “feature” on my home PC’s. I’m definitly interested in hearing of your results with other extensions.

    • Avatar

      I disabled only the prompts. I still believe that too many security prompts reduce security in the long run because one gets used to it. I now played a little with Symantec’s solution. It seems to be the better solution. I will post something about it soon.

  2. Avatar
    Ronin Vladiamhe 15 years ago

    You know, I still hit the drop down, to see what program is actually triggering the prompt. I’ve read about Symantec’s UAC filter, but the verdict is still out on it for me.

  3. Avatar
    Ron 15 years ago

    I just tried it on my HP laptop. No luck. About a minute after startup, definitely after the program has started, the whole screen “smears out”. Have to hard reboot.

    The description sounded exactly like what I was looking for. This is the second tool I’ve tried. Guess I’ll keep looking.

  4. Avatar
    Adrian Ballow 14 years ago

    I doubted about Smart UAC as it was free and I thought it’s a lousy software. Suddenly I’ve read about it in PCUtilities where the program had got 3 stars. I’d decided to install it. Pretty good, actually.

  5. Avatar
    Jack 2 years ago

    Michael, anxious for your findings and results….have been waiting now 12 yrs.later.

    please weigh in kn it. much thanks!




    I now played a little with Symantec's solution. It seems to be the better solution. I will post something about it soon.

Leave a reply to Ronin Vladiamhe Click here to cancel the reply

Please enclose code in pre tags

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


© 4sysops 2006 - 2023


Please ask IT administration questions in the forums. Any other messages are welcome.


Log in with your credentials


Forgot your details?

Create Account