<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP SP3 beta release date news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:54:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/comment-page-1/#comment-22444</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/#comment-22444</guid>
		<description>For the 802.1X enforcement method the switch also has to support RADIUS. But they are other enforcement methods. For smaller companies DHCP enforcement probably is the best solution since it is quite easy to configure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the 802.1X enforcement method the switch also has to support RADIUS. But they are other enforcement methods. For smaller companies DHCP enforcement probably is the best solution since it is quite easy to configure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Beeler</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/comment-page-1/#comment-22381</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Beeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-xp-sp3-beta-release-date-news/#comment-22381</guid>
		<description>Yeah, i think the introduction of NAP support for XP will help a lot with it&#039;s deployment.

I like the idea of NAP in general, but it includes a lot of hard work. Without 802.1x, it doesn&#039;t make much sense (or i understood something wrong), and 802.1x support for most other network devices isn&#039;t where it should be (an obvious solution is to create seperate segments for printers etc.).

I also don&#039;t see NAP in smaller businesses, just because of the increased complexity - though small businesses are much more often exposed to unpatched, private laptops etc. because of more lax policies, and the fact that these policies are usually not enforced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i think the introduction of NAP support for XP will help a lot with it&#8217;s deployment.</p>
<p>I like the idea of NAP in general, but it includes a lot of hard work. Without 802.1x, it doesn&#8217;t make much sense (or i understood something wrong), and 802.1x support for most other network devices isn&#8217;t where it should be (an obvious solution is to create seperate segments for printers etc.).</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see NAP in smaller businesses, just because of the increased complexity &#8211; though small businesses are much more often exposed to unpatched, private laptops etc. because of more lax policies, and the fact that these policies are usually not enforced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
