<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 release date in January 2010? Is this a gimmick release?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A, m-d</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-131581</link>
		<dc:creator>A, m-d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-131581</guid>
		<description>in fact i heard that it isnt actually windows 7 at all it is windows 6.1 offically. So really it is just vista. i think microsoft have done that before as well if you cont up all the versions excuding windows 7 it actually gets you to 8. they must have done it before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in fact i heard that it isnt actually windows 7 at all it is windows 6.1 offically. So really it is just vista. i think microsoft have done that before as well if you cont up all the versions excuding windows 7 it actually gets you to 8. they must have done it before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-82374</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-82374</guid>
		<description>Jan, I think Microsoft learned this already from Linux distros. Sooner or later you will get this installer you have in mind. I think these talks about the mini kernel and about more modularization in Windows 7 indicate that MS is going in this direction. However, this is not easy to accomplish. So I doubt somehow that it will already come with Windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan, I think Microsoft learned this already from Linux distros. Sooner or later you will get this installer you have in mind. I think these talks about the mini kernel and about more modularization in Windows 7 indicate that MS is going in this direction. However, this is not easy to accomplish. So I doubt somehow that it will already come with Windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Ivar Beddari</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-80820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Ivar Beddari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-80820</guid>
		<description>Yeah I also remember 2000 was said to be &quot;too fat&quot; and the IE &quot;active desktop&quot; integration was bashed, I remember hacks to run the win95 explorer.exe hehe. Seems like peanuts nowadays.

From what I can gather over the past few years of vista-coverage and Microsofts plans to release more often I think you might be right about what we will see Michael, changes this time around will be fewer.

What I&#039;m dreaming about is that MS learns from the way linux distros install themselves (yea, hahaha) and go with a new installer that lets you select what features you want on a whole new level than before. As an IT pro, imagine being able to install a seriously cut-down version of Vista with all the under-the-hood stuff thats great ..

I hope MS learn that computing today isn&#039;t what it was when XP was released. XP was special in that it could satisfy (over time) the needs of both businesses and home users. Vista can&#039;t as easily, to date, and they need to adress this asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I also remember 2000 was said to be &#8220;too fat&#8221; and the IE &#8220;active desktop&#8221; integration was bashed, I remember hacks to run the win95 explorer.exe hehe. Seems like peanuts nowadays.</p>
<p>From what I can gather over the past few years of vista-coverage and Microsofts plans to release more often I think you might be right about what we will see Michael, changes this time around will be fewer.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m dreaming about is that MS learns from the way linux distros install themselves (yea, hahaha) and go with a new installer that lets you select what features you want on a whole new level than before. As an IT pro, imagine being able to install a seriously cut-down version of Vista with all the under-the-hood stuff thats great ..</p>
<p>I hope MS learn that computing today isn&#8217;t what it was when XP was released. XP was special in that it could satisfy (over time) the needs of both businesses and home users. Vista can&#8217;t as easily, to date, and they need to adress this asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-80582</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-80582</guid>
		<description>Lukas, you’re right in a way this is comparable. However, the difference is that Windows 2000 was slapped for other reasons than Vista. If I remember it right, journalists complained that Windows 2000 is too fat and therefore unstable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lukas, you’re right in a way this is comparable. However, the difference is that Windows 2000 was slapped for other reasons than Vista. If I remember it right, journalists complained that Windows 2000 is too fat and therefore unstable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4sysops - Windows 7 release date in January 2010? Is this a gimmick release? &#124; WinSe7en</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-80290</link>
		<dc:creator>4sysops - Windows 7 release date in January 2010? Is this a gimmick release? &#124; WinSe7en</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-80290</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft will miss a Christmas rush again after missing it with Vista. See the original post at: 4sysops - Windows 7 release date in January 2010? Is this a gimmick release? Tags: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft will miss a Christmas rush again after missing it with Vista. See the original post at: 4sysops &#8211; Windows 7 release date in January 2010? Is this a gimmick release? Tags: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Beeler</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-release-date-in-january-2010-is-this-a-gimmick-release/comment-page-1/#comment-80288</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Beeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1394#comment-80288</guid>
		<description>Just like XP was a refined 2k with gimmicks and consumer features added... And XP came out just a bit after 2k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like XP was a refined 2k with gimmicks and consumer features added&#8230; And XP came out just a bit after 2k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
