<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7: 64-bit or 32-bit? Memory and performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: palookajoe</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-157782</link>
		<dc:creator>palookajoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-157782</guid>
		<description>In reply to mehrdad — December 18, 2009 about macintosh. IMO mac is the worst OS out there, hardly any progs work with it and having to mount everything is pretty bogus in my opinion....takes way too long to install programs. Mac is a minority and always will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to mehrdad — December 18, 2009 about macintosh. IMO mac is the worst OS out there, hardly any progs work with it and having to mount everything is pretty bogus in my opinion&#8230;.takes way too long to install programs. Mac is a minority and always will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-156432</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-156432</guid>
		<description>I have Windows 7 Home premium x64 edition. My laptop has 4 Gigs of ram. I am a student and use it primarily for school and research and reading. I multi-task like crazy. sometimes 4 and 5 internet windows open receiving live feeds, word documents, pdf, downloads, etc... and i do this all at the same time split screen all that, and windows handles everything perfectly. I have no problems and have been quite shocked as to the performance level of windows7 x64. I am not the most computer savvy person however. Other than keeping lotsa junk off my startup programs, and not leaving millions of old applications installed, and clearing your internet files, is there other ways to maximize my use of ram so it can be more focused with performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Windows 7 Home premium x64 edition. My laptop has 4 Gigs of ram. I am a student and use it primarily for school and research and reading. I multi-task like crazy. sometimes 4 and 5 internet windows open receiving live feeds, word documents, pdf, downloads, etc&#8230; and i do this all at the same time split screen all that, and windows handles everything perfectly. I have no problems and have been quite shocked as to the performance level of windows7 x64. I am not the most computer savvy person however. Other than keeping lotsa junk off my startup programs, and not leaving millions of old applications installed, and clearing your internet files, is there other ways to maximize my use of ram so it can be more focused with performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morf</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-151596</link>
		<dc:creator>morf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-151596</guid>
		<description>Macintash? Thanks Mehrdad I&#039;ll look out for that one. does it come with a spell checker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macintash? Thanks Mehrdad I&#8217;ll look out for that one. does it come with a spell checker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mehrdad</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-145860</link>
		<dc:creator>mehrdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-145860</guid>
		<description>hello , the perfect OS for computer is MACINTASH snow leopard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello , the perfect OS for computer is MACINTASH snow leopard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-141229</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-141229</guid>
		<description>What happens if I load windows xp7-x64 not -x32 on a computer using only 2g ddr2 ram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if I load windows xp7-x64 not -x32 on a computer using only 2g ddr2 ram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pietroforte</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-140900</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pietroforte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-140900</guid>
		<description>You could use your software with &lt;a href=&quot;http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-xp-mode-a-step-by-step-guide/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;XP Mode&lt;/a&gt;. Another option is to install the 32-bit version of Windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could use your software with <a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-xp-mode-a-step-by-step-guide/" rel="nofollow">XP Mode</a>. Another option is to install the 32-bit version of Windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathie Miller</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-140896</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathie Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-140896</guid>
		<description>We just bought 3 computers for our business and they all have Windows 7 Home Premium on them.  It has a 64 bit and I tried loading our business software but when it wouldn&#039;t load I called support and they told me the program only works with 32 bit.  I&#039;m guessing our only solution is to down-grade to XP so it will work.  We hate Vista and won&#039;t use that. I&#039;m assuming we can&#039;t change the windows 7 bit as I understand they have a 32 bit.  This is just confusing and I&#039;m really getting disgusted with the whole deal.  I tried booting with our XP Professional upgrade but it didn&#039;t recognize that we had a previous windows operating system.  Any ideas?  Of course microsoft support won&#039;t help.  On a new machine we should get free support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just bought 3 computers for our business and they all have Windows 7 Home Premium on them.  It has a 64 bit and I tried loading our business software but when it wouldn&#8217;t load I called support and they told me the program only works with 32 bit.  I&#8217;m guessing our only solution is to down-grade to XP so it will work.  We hate Vista and won&#8217;t use that. I&#8217;m assuming we can&#8217;t change the windows 7 bit as I understand they have a 32 bit.  This is just confusing and I&#8217;m really getting disgusted with the whole deal.  I tried booting with our XP Professional upgrade but it didn&#8217;t recognize that we had a previous windows operating system.  Any ideas?  Of course microsoft support won&#8217;t help.  On a new machine we should get free support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-135527</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-135527</guid>
		<description>can you have windows vista 64bit and/or windows 7 on a 32bit system or would it not work 


email me asap

dave21raidrs@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you have windows vista 64bit and/or windows 7 on a 32bit system or would it not work </p>
<p>email me asap</p>
<p><a href="mailto:dave21raidrs@aol.com">dave21raidrs@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew H</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-132823</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-132823</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 x64&#039;s maximum RAM depends on what edition you have. You can only upgrade to 192 GB on Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate. The other editions support less maximum RAM.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/04/25/revealed-more-windows-7-rc-details.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 x64&#8217;s maximum RAM depends on what edition you have. You can only upgrade to 192 GB on Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate. The other editions support less maximum RAM.</p>
<p><a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/04/25/revealed-more-windows-7-rc-details.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/04/25/revealed-more-windows-7-rc-details.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pietroforte</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-132778</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pietroforte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-132778</guid>
		<description>Donald, thanks! I corrected the article. I think there is a huge difference between 16TB and 192GB. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald, thanks! I corrected the article. I think there is a huge difference between 16TB and 192GB. <img src='http://4sysops.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Haase</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-132673</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Haase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-132673</guid>
		<description>Your article contains a factual error: &quot;Windows 7 x64 cannot only make use of up to 16TB RAM&quot;. 16TB is simply one of the theoretical limits. In fact, no version of Windows 7 can address more than 192GB of RAM (not that it makes a huge difference).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article contains a factual error: &#8220;Windows 7 x64 cannot only make use of up to 16TB RAM&#8221;. 16TB is simply one of the theoretical limits. In fact, no version of Windows 7 can address more than 192GB of RAM (not that it makes a huge difference).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pietroforte</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-132391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pietroforte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-132391</guid>
		<description>Yeah it is really funny. Most 4GB machines you see in the shelves these days come with Vista x86. This false belief that 32-bit supports 4GB is widespread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it is really funny. Most 4GB machines you see in the shelves these days come with Vista x86. This false belief that 32-bit supports 4GB is widespread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job Hunting Tips</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-7-64-bit-or-32-bit-memory-and-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-132327</link>
		<dc:creator>Job Hunting Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=3241#comment-132327</guid>
		<description>I had no idea that 32-bit  architectures could only handle a maximum of 3 GB of ram. 

Shocking that computer companies will allow you to build and ship a 32 bit system that has more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea that 32-bit  architectures could only handle a maximum of 3 GB of ram. </p>
<p>Shocking that computer companies will allow you to build and ship a 32 bit system that has more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
