Comments on: Vista ReadyBoost doesn’t improve performance http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/ For Windows Administrators Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Michael http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-27351 Michael Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:30:25 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-27351 Bob, I didn’t read yet about performance tests of SuperFetch. But somehow I doubt that it really helps to improve performance. It seems to me that this technology is not yet ready. I am going to post something about ReadyDrive soon. The situation there is not really better. Bob, I didn’t read yet about performance tests of SuperFetch. But somehow I doubt that it really helps to improve performance. It seems to me that this technology is not yet ready. I am going to post something about ReadyDrive soon. The situation there is not really better.

]]> By: » ¿ReadyBoost funciona realmente? Win-Vista.es | Blog de Windows Vista http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26968 » ¿ReadyBoost funciona realmente? Win-Vista.es | Blog de Windows Vista Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:21:48 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26968 [...] | Vía 4SysOps [...] [...] | Vía 4SysOps [...]

]]> By: Bob http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26886 Bob Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:41:38 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26886 I would like to see a performance analysis of SuperFetch in the near future. Since the user has no control over what apps get cached, you end up with a very long boot time as seldom used large apps are loaded into memory. ReadyBoost performance might be improved if the user were given an option to disable encryption, along with a utility to wipe the RB portion of the flash drive when needed. I would like to see a performance analysis of SuperFetch in the near future. Since the user has no control over what apps get cached, you end up with a very long boot time as seldom used large apps are loaded into memory.

ReadyBoost performance might be improved if the user were given an option to disable encryption, along with a utility to wipe the RB portion of the flash drive when needed.

]]> By: Tom http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26831 Tom Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:17:54 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26831 the encryption / decryption wouldn't be a problem if MS wrote their apps to make better use of different cores - especially with quad cores - 1 core for the os, 1 core for the services, 1 core for the apps etc etc the encryption / decryption wouldn’t be a problem if MS wrote their apps to make better use of different cores – especially with quad cores – 1 core for the os, 1 core for the services, 1 core for the apps etc etc

]]> By: ITsVISTA Web Links: October 11th, 2007 | ITsVISTA http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26825 ITsVISTA Web Links: October 11th, 2007 | ITsVISTA Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:34:43 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26825 [...] Vista ReadyBoost doesn?t improve performance Apparently in some cases it even hurts performance. (tags: ReadyBoost ) [...] [...] Vista ReadyBoost doesn?t improve performance Apparently in some cases it even hurts performance. (tags: ReadyBoost ) [...]

]]> By: Michael http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26811 Michael Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:13:11 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26811 Yeah, I also made this experience before, but I thought that my USB stick was just too slow, or that my system didn’t meet the requirements for ReadyBoost. But the C’t guys tested it under almost every thinkable condition. So it is really seems that ReadyBoost is absolutely useless. Yeah, I also made this experience before, but I thought that my USB stick was just too slow, or that my system didn’t meet the requirements for ReadyBoost. But the C’t guys tested it under almost every thinkable condition. So it is really seems that ReadyBoost is absolutely useless.

]]> By: Leonardo http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-26808 Leonardo Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:53:32 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-readyboost-doesn%e2%80%99t-improve-performance/#comment-26808 I came to the same conclusion. Tried out RB during different phases of the Vista Beta/RC and then on the final. Didn't need to run benchmarks (Wasn't publishing the results ), I could tell it was slower. As you said, we'll see about it when(much) faster Flash comes around. I came to the same conclusion. Tried out RB during different phases of the Vista Beta/RC and then on the final. Didn’t need to run benchmarks (Wasn’t publishing the results ), I could tell it was slower.
As you said, we’ll see about it when(much) faster Flash comes around.

]]>