<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista performance and compatibility/reliability updates &#8211; Is it SP 0.5?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/comment-page-1/#comment-21475</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/#comment-21475</guid>
		<description>Thanks the the heads-up, Michael and the tip morphly.

BTW: I have the patched Tcpip.sys on a x32 copy of Vista, no problems installing both patches...
I hardly ever get 4226&#039;d, and haven&#039;t yet checked to see if I have to re-patch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks the the heads-up, Michael and the tip morphly.</p>
<p>BTW: I have the patched Tcpip.sys on a x32 copy of Vista, no problems installing both patches&#8230;<br />
I hardly ever get 4226&#8242;d, and haven&#8217;t yet checked to see if I have to re-patch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/comment-page-1/#comment-21400</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/#comment-21400</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morphly</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/comment-page-1/#comment-21188</link>
		<dc:creator>morphly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-performance-and-compatibilityreliability-updates-is-it-sp-05/#comment-21188</guid>
		<description>FYI - if you have Vista X64 and the patched tcpip.sys (EventID 4226) installed your network will fail to start after installation of KB938979(performance). This is due to further kernel-mode driver restrictions coming with this hotfix... you should better have a backup of your original tcpip.sys ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; if you have Vista X64 and the patched tcpip.sys (EventID 4226) installed your network will fail to start after installation of KB938979(performance). This is due to further kernel-mode driver restrictions coming with this hotfix&#8230; you should better have a backup of your original tcpip.sys <img src='http://4sysops.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
