http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-activation-results-of-the-kms-vs-mak-poll/ For Windows Administrators Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:58:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-activation-results-of-the-kms-vs-mak-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-37308 Michael Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:19:29 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-activation-results-of-the-kms-vs-mak-poll/#comment-37308 Smita, I agree. We also use KMS now. Smita, I agree. We also use KMS now.

]]> http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-activation-results-of-the-kms-vs-mak-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-36757 Smita Jain Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:46:38 +0000 http://4sysops.com/archives/vista-activation-results-of-the-kms-vs-mak-poll/#comment-36757 It's great if you use KMS if you have more than 25 machine you should go for KMS and MAK combination in our case we have deployed more than 2000n Machines only the machines which are not available we are using MAK activation otherwise it's simple keep it on KMS and let KMS do it's wonder. If you are worried about availability of your KMS server just make a failover (simply deploy two KMS with different priority) and forget about the activation part as soon as you are in domain environment it's great. Hats off to KMS. It’s great if you use KMS if you have more than 25 machine you should go for KMS and MAK combination in our case we have deployed more than 2000n Machines only the machines which are not available we are using MAK activation otherwise it’s simple keep it on KMS and let KMS do it’s wonder. If you are worried about availability of your KMS server just make a failover (simply deploy two KMS with different priority) and forget about the activation part as soon as you are in domain environment it’s great.
Hats off to KMS.

]]>