<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweets: email archiving study &#8211; Portable PowerShell &#8211; Microsoft as Linux vendor &#8211; Microsoft eases virtualization licensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-email-archiving-study-portable-powershell-microsoft-as-linux-vendor-microsoft-eases-virtualization-licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-email-archiving-study-portable-powershell-microsoft-as-linux-vendor-microsoft-eases-virtualization-licensing/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy R.</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-email-archiving-study-portable-powershell-microsoft-as-linux-vendor-microsoft-eases-virtualization-licensing/comment-page-1/#comment-117746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1523#comment-117746</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re buying new pc&#039;s downgraded to XP also b/c vista will not run our software. Same reason as Dave B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re buying new pc&#8217;s downgraded to XP also b/c vista will not run our software. Same reason as Dave B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Ivar Beddari</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-email-archiving-study-portable-powershell-microsoft-as-linux-vendor-microsoft-eases-virtualization-licensing/comment-page-1/#comment-99696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Ivar Beddari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1523#comment-99696</guid>
		<description>I actually had to click through from my rss-reader to see if someone had caught that bait, and yes ..

.. we don&#039;t have to go through this all again, do we? hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had to click through from my rss-reader to see if someone had caught that bait, and yes ..</p>
<p>.. we don&#8217;t have to go through this all again, do we? hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B.</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-email-archiving-study-portable-powershell-microsoft-as-linux-vendor-microsoft-eases-virtualization-licensing/comment-page-1/#comment-99532</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1523#comment-99532</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I wonder why those people buy new PCs.&lt;/i&gt;

We&#039;re buying new PCs and installing XP on them because we have several seismic and mapping applications that are completely unsupported under Vista, or require an exceptionally costly upgrade fee for the vista compatible version(more the former than the latter). We downgrade all PCs because a common fleet is easier to manage, both from a technical standpoint and a user standpoint. We don&#039;t have to stop and think &quot;Ok, how do I do this in vista vs XP again?&quot; as well as deal with users that can&#039;t run vista being upset that the receptionist has it when they can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I wonder why those people buy new PCs.</i></p>
<p>We&#8217;re buying new PCs and installing XP on them because we have several seismic and mapping applications that are completely unsupported under Vista, or require an exceptionally costly upgrade fee for the vista compatible version(more the former than the latter). We downgrade all PCs because a common fleet is easier to manage, both from a technical standpoint and a user standpoint. We don&#8217;t have to stop and think &#8220;Ok, how do I do this in vista vs XP again?&#8221; as well as deal with users that can&#8217;t run vista being upset that the receptionist has it when they can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
