<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweets: Active Directory Reports 2.3.1.1 &#8211; NTFS ADS &#8211; password formula &#8211; Vista x64 &#8211; IE8 &#8211; Backup Exec 12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-active-directory-reports-2311-ntfs-ads-password-formula-vista-x64-ie8-backup-exec-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-active-directory-reports-2311-ntfs-ads-password-formula-vista-x64-ie8-backup-exec-12/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-active-directory-reports-2311-ntfs-ads-password-formula-vista-x64-ie8-backup-exec-12/comment-page-1/#comment-94180</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1484#comment-94180</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree that Backup Exec is very unreliable. And that is probably the worst thing that can happen for a backup tool. I think that the future belongs to continuous data protection anyway. Backup Exec supports this now. However, in my view it doesn’t make sense to just add CDP features to a conventional backup tool. CDP is conceptually quite different that it is better to just start from scratch with a new solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree that Backup Exec is very unreliable. And that is probably the worst thing that can happen for a backup tool. I think that the future belongs to continuous data protection anyway. Backup Exec supports this now. However, in my view it doesn’t make sense to just add CDP features to a conventional backup tool. CDP is conceptually quite different that it is better to just start from scratch with a new solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizard of Oz</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/tweets-active-directory-reports-2311-ntfs-ads-password-formula-vista-x64-ie8-backup-exec-12/comment-page-1/#comment-93187</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizard of Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1484#comment-93187</guid>
		<description>Backup Exec must be one of the most unreliable pieces of software ever developed, and the customer support follows suit.

I have been working with Windows Servers since 1996, and I have never seen a server with Backup Exec installed that didn&#039;t, after some time, have problems with the backups. I have successfully switched every server away from BackupExec.

I would highly recommend that anybody in the need for backups (and who isn&#039;t) consider alternatives.

We&#039;ve used NTBackup and BackupAssist to work quite well in most scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backup Exec must be one of the most unreliable pieces of software ever developed, and the customer support follows suit.</p>
<p>I have been working with Windows Servers since 1996, and I have never seen a server with Backup Exec installed that didn&#8217;t, after some time, have problems with the backups. I have successfully switched every server away from BackupExec.</p>
<p>I would highly recommend that anybody in the need for backups (and who isn&#8217;t) consider alternatives.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve used NTBackup and BackupAssist to work quite well in most scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
