<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Adminpak tools will be replaced with RSAT for Vista SP1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:37:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shan</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-19097</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/#comment-19097</guid>
		<description>A virtual admin box is definitely the way to go, although my reasons were different. I run an XP administration machine on my Vista laptop so that all the various interfaces for all the different legacy stuff on my network still works, and I can keep the VM logged in as an admin whilst using a standard account on the physical machine for browsing, mail etc. An added advantage is that the same Admin workstation VM works a treat on my MacBook Pro under VMware Fusion.

(Rats - my secret is out - yes, I&#039;m a closet Mac-o-phile)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A virtual admin box is definitely the way to go, although my reasons were different. I run an XP administration machine on my Vista laptop so that all the various interfaces for all the different legacy stuff on my network still works, and I can keep the VM logged in as an admin whilst using a standard account on the physical machine for browsing, mail etc. An added advantage is that the same Admin workstation VM works a treat on my MacBook Pro under VMware Fusion.</p>
<p>(Rats &#8211; my secret is out &#8211; yes, I&#8217;m a closet Mac-o-phile)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-19031</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/#comment-19031</guid>
		<description>This is a smart solution for this problem. You just need enough RAM on your workstation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a smart solution for this problem. You just need enough RAM on your workstation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Beeler</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-19029</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Beeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/the-adminpak-tools-will-be-replaced-with-rsat-for-vista-sp1/#comment-19029</guid>
		<description>How about an &quot;Admin Server&quot;?

It&#039;s the approach i&#039;ve used - a WS2003 Virtual Machines where i have all my Snap Ins i need, and logon with an account with the permissions i need.

The advantages of this are pretty obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about an &#8220;Admin Server&#8221;?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the approach i&#8217;ve used &#8211; a WS2003 Virtual Machines where i have all my Snap Ins i need, and logon with an account with the permissions i need.</p>
<p>The advantages of this are pretty obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
