<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>4sysops &#187; fault tolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/tag/fault-tolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Server 2008: Dynamic Partitioning</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-dynamic-partitioning/</link>
		<comments>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-dynamic-partitioning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pietroforte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows server 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-dynamic-partitioning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#38;articleId=9019641&#38;pageNumber=1">Computerworld</a> has an interesting article about a new feature of Windows Server 2008: <strong>Dynamic Partitioning</strong>. A hardware partitionable server can have isolated hardware partitions comprising <strong>CPU, memory and I/O</strong>. Each of these segments runs its own Windows instance. It allows you to <strong>add, replace and remove hardware without rebooting Windows</strong>. This not only improves fault tolerance, but also scalability.</p>
<p>In a way, it is RAID for CPU, memory and I/O. This certainly important feature is not a new revolutionary technology, though. Mainframe systems always had similar capabilities. Therefore, it will be one further step for Microsoft in <strong>pushing Windows into the datacenter</strong>. Unfortunately, this feature will only be supported by the <strong>Datacenter and the Itanium editions</strong> of Windows Server 2008. By the way, Windows Server 2003 already <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/hotadd/hotaddmem.mspx">supports</a> hot-add memory.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note, that the white paper about the <a href="/archives/new-features-and-changes-in-functionality-of-windows-server-2008/">new features of Windows Server 2008</a>, I linked to earlier, doesn&#8217;t mention this new &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9019641&amp;pageNumber=1">Computerworld</a> has an interesting article about a new feature of Windows Server 2008: <strong>Dynamic Partitioning</strong>. A hardware partitionable server can have isolated hardware partitions comprising <strong>CPU, memory and I/O</strong>. Each of these segments runs its own Windows instance. It allows you to <strong>add, replace and remove hardware without rebooting Windows</strong>. This not only improves fault tolerance, but also scalability.</p>
<p>In a way, it is RAID for CPU, memory and I/O. This certainly important feature is not a new revolutionary technology, though. Mainframe systems always had similar capabilities. Therefore, it will be one further step for Microsoft in <strong>pushing Windows into the datacenter</strong>. Unfortunately, this feature will only be supported by the <strong>Datacenter and the Itanium editions</strong> of Windows Server 2008. By the way, Windows Server 2003 already <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/hotadd/hotaddmem.mspx">supports</a> hot-add memory.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note, that the white paper about the <a href="/archives/new-features-and-changes-in-functionality-of-windows-server-2008/">new features of Windows Server 2008</a>, I linked to earlier, doesn&#8217;t mention this new capability. If you want to know more technical details about Dynamic Partitioning, or about the &#8220;<strong>hot swap feature</strong>&#8221; as some call it, I recommend this <a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/f/98f3fe47-dfc3-4e74-92a3-088782200fe7/TWAR05016_WinHEC05.ppt">PowerPoint presentation</a>.</p>
Author: Michael Pietroforte
<br />
<small>Copyright &#169; 2006-2012, 4sysops, Digital fingerprint: 3db371642e7c3f4fe3ee9d5cf7666eb0</small><br />
	<br /><strong>Related</strong>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/microsoft-exam-70-640-configuring-dns-zones-overview/" title="Microsoft Exam 70-640 &#8211; DNS Zones &#8211; Overview (January 10, 2012)">Microsoft Exam 70-640 &#8211; DNS Zones &#8211; Overview</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-foundation-why-microsofts-licensing-policy-is-outdated/" title="Windows Server 2008 Foundation &#8211; Why Microsoft&#8217;s licensing policy is outdated (April 13, 2009)">Windows Server 2008 Foundation &#8211; Why Microsoft&#8217;s licensing policy is outdated</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-step-by-step-guides-don%e2%80%99t-waste-your-time/" title="Windows Server 2008 step-by-step guides &#8211; Don’t waste your time (March 24, 2008)">Windows Server 2008 step-by-step guides &#8211; Don’t waste your time</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/new-features-in-windows-server-2008/" title="New features in Windows Server 2008 (February 13, 2008)">New features in Windows Server 2008</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/download-windows-server-2008-rtm/" title="Download Windows Server 2008 RTM? (February 5, 2008)">Download Windows Server 2008 RTM?</a> (6)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-dynamic-partitioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marathon EverRun FT: fault tolerance by virtualization</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/marathon-everrun-ft-fault-tolerance-by-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://4sysops.com/archives/marathon-everrun-ft-fault-tolerance-by-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pietroforte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault tolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/marathon-everrun-ft-fault-tolerance-by-virtualization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Marathon Technologies offers an interesting fault tolerance solution for Windows using virtualization technology. Server virtualization usually means that you have multiple virtual servers running on one physical server. <a href="http://www.marathontechnologies.com/products.html" target="_blank">EverRun FT</a> is software that does the opposite. It unites two physical servers to one virtual server.</p>
<p>So its purpose is not server consolidation but fault tolerance. This sounds like server clustering. However, there are some fundamental differences.</p>
<p>The biggest advantage of EverRun FT compared to clustering solutions is that the applications don&#8217;t have to be cluster-aware. Furthermore, there will be no failover if one of the servers breaks down, i.e. the virtual server will continue running without any downtime.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://4sysops.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/EverRun-FT.jpg" alt="EverRun FT" title="EverRun FT" align="middle" /></p>
<p>The disadvantage is that both physical servers have to be absolutely identical. You even have to patch them simultaneously. During the patching process you will have a short downtime.</p>
<p>This technology seems to be very promising to me. The price of $14,000 is not so promising though.</p>
Author: Michael Pietroforte
<br />
<small>Copyright &#169; &#8230;</small>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marathon Technologies offers an interesting fault tolerance solution for Windows using virtualization technology. Server virtualization usually means that you have multiple virtual servers running on one physical server. <a href="http://www.marathontechnologies.com/products.html" target="_blank">EverRun FT</a> is software that does the opposite. It unites two physical servers to one virtual server.</p>
<p>So its purpose is not server consolidation but fault tolerance. This sounds like server clustering. However, there are some fundamental differences.</p>
<p>The biggest advantage of EverRun FT compared to clustering solutions is that the applications don&#8217;t have to be cluster-aware. Furthermore, there will be no failover if one of the servers breaks down, i.e. the virtual server will continue running without any downtime.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://4sysops.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/EverRun-FT.jpg" alt="EverRun FT" title="EverRun FT" align="middle" /></p>
<p>The disadvantage is that both physical servers have to be absolutely identical. You even have to patch them simultaneously. During the patching process you will have a short downtime.</p>
<p>This technology seems to be very promising to me. The price of $14,000 is not so promising though.</p>
Author: Michael Pietroforte
<br />
<small>Copyright &#169; 2006-2012, 4sysops, Digital fingerprint: 3db371642e7c3f4fe3ee9d5cf7666eb0</small><br />
	<br /><strong>Related</strong>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/windows-server-2008-dynamic-partitioning/" title="Windows Server 2008: Dynamic Partitioning (May 21, 2007)">Windows Server 2008: Dynamic Partitioning</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://4sysops.com/archives/marathon-everrun-ft-fault-tolerance-by-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

