<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Windows 7 BitLocker to Go &#8211; Part 1: Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-138320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=2318#comment-138320</guid>
		<description>I was wondering how are encryption keys shared in a corporate environment? For example, if I have a department sharing removable media, I want it encrypted with a key that they can all access and don&#039;t need to call me for the password or recovery password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how are encryption keys shared in a corporate environment? For example, if I have a department sharing removable media, I want it encrypted with a key that they can all access and don&#8217;t need to call me for the password or recovery password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-130606</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=2318#comment-130606</guid>
		<description>A real downside to every software encryption system right now is that you can&#039;t mount the encrypted disk on just any computer. Usually you&#039;re stuck with a extremely cumbersome reader/writer program as a middle man between explorer and the disk. The reason for this is because &quot;limited&quot; users don&#039;t have privileges to load drivers and the only way to get the encrypted disk to talk with the OS directly is with a driver. And even if Microsoft would backport this to XP, it still wouldn&#039;t work on Linux or Mac systems. What is needed is a good STANDARD encryption format for removable devices. Currently, every OS has encryption capabilities, but they all do it in different ways so nothing is interoperable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real downside to every software encryption system right now is that you can&#8217;t mount the encrypted disk on just any computer. Usually you&#8217;re stuck with a extremely cumbersome reader/writer program as a middle man between explorer and the disk. The reason for this is because &#8220;limited&#8221; users don&#8217;t have privileges to load drivers and the only way to get the encrypted disk to talk with the OS directly is with a driver. And even if Microsoft would backport this to XP, it still wouldn&#8217;t work on Linux or Mac systems. What is needed is a good STANDARD encryption format for removable devices. Currently, every OS has encryption capabilities, but they all do it in different ways so nothing is interoperable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-125585</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=2318#comment-125585</guid>
		<description>It is unfortunate that Microsoft has restricted the capability to write to such a &quot;Bitlocker To Go&quot; encrypted device to only 7 Ultimate and Enterprise. I, as a personal user, (and am sure many others) would be willing to upgrade to Ultimate to be able to create an encrypted USB stick, but the fact that I wouldn&#039;t be able to write to it on any other standard Windows machine would completely put me off even using this feature in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is unfortunate that Microsoft has restricted the capability to write to such a &#8220;Bitlocker To Go&#8221; encrypted device to only 7 Ultimate and Enterprise. I, as a personal user, (and am sure many others) would be willing to upgrade to Ultimate to be able to create an encrypted USB stick, but the fact that I wouldn&#8217;t be able to write to it on any other standard Windows machine would completely put me off even using this feature in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: System</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-125217</link>
		<dc:creator>System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=2318#comment-125217</guid>
		<description>I have used Bitlocker-To-Go to encrypt a USB drive on my Windows 7 machine and then used the drive on a Vista Home Premium machine without any problems. It asked for a password when I tried to access the drive and then let me get at my data. I haven&#039;t tried it on XP or 2000 yet but I don&#039;t imagine they would have nay problems either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Bitlocker-To-Go to encrypt a USB drive on my Windows 7 machine and then used the drive on a Vista Home Premium machine without any problems. It asked for a password when I tried to access the drive and then let me get at my data. I haven&#8217;t tried it on XP or 2000 yet but I don&#8217;t imagine they would have nay problems either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows7..What do you think? - Page 6</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/review-windows-7-bitlocker-to-go-part-1-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-123279</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows7..What do you think? - Page 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=2318#comment-123279</guid>
		<description>[...] a bit more info on it here 4sysops - Review: Windows 7 BitLocker to Go - Part 1: Usability  I&#039;ve just noticed this however  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a bit more info on it here 4sysops &#8211; Review: Windows 7 BitLocker to Go &#8211; Part 1: Usability  I&#8217;ve just noticed this however  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
