<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overview of application virtualization solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:37:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An in-depth jumpstart for application virtualization &#124; טכנו-ביסים (techno-bites)</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-99290</link>
		<dc:creator>An in-depth jumpstart for application virtualization &#124; טכנו-ביסים (techno-bites)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-99290</guid>
		<description>[...] published an extensive, 9-parts article on different application virtualization products available on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] published an extensive, 9-parts article on different application virtualization products available on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Checklist voor applicatievirtualisatie &#171; EarlyBert</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-94203</link>
		<dc:creator>Checklist voor applicatievirtualisatie &#171; EarlyBert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-94203</guid>
		<description>[...] en streaming op een rij gezet. De verzameling is nu aangevuld met een checklist van features: Overview of application virtualization solutionsApplication Virtualization products - the complete listReview: Xenocode Virtual Application [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en streaming op een rij gezet. De verzameling is nu aangevuld met een checklist van features: Overview of application virtualization solutionsApplication Virtualization products &#8211; the complete listReview: Xenocode Virtual Application [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-78189</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-78189</guid>
		<description>Bert, thank you very much for the link to this list. I am reading virtualization.info, but I wasn’t aware of this very useful overview. I will post a new article shortly that will contain all application virtualization products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert, thank you very much for the link to this list. I am reading virtualization.info, but I wasn’t aware of this very useful overview. I will post a new article shortly that will contain all application virtualization products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Bouwhuis</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-77168</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Bouwhuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-77168</guid>
		<description>Then I would suggest to also add Ceedo and InstallFree to your list. There may even be a couple of others, see e.g. http://www.virtualization.info/radar/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then I would suggest to also add Ceedo and InstallFree to your list. There may even be a couple of others, see e.g. <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/radar/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualization.info/radar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-76947</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-76947</guid>
		<description>Dude, thanks a lot for the hint. I added MojoPac and another one to the list. If the Cisco VPN client really works, then this indeed means something. This thing doesn’t even work properly on my Vista machine. ;-)

Ochriu, I think it is not the only VMware solution which is a bit overpriced. I guess that is the privilege of the market leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, thanks a lot for the hint. I added MojoPac and another one to the list. If the Cisco VPN client really works, then this indeed means something. This thing doesn’t even work properly on my Vista machine. <img src='http://4sysops.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ochriu, I think it is not the only VMware solution which is a bit overpriced. I guess that is the privilege of the market leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ochiru</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-76696</link>
		<dc:creator>ochiru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-76696</guid>
		<description>Thinstall is the best for Application Virtualization but 5k$ for it is a big joke!

At that price tag it should be more polished, automatic and offer driver virtualization too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinstall is the best for Application Virtualization but 5k$ for it is a big joke!</p>
<p>At that price tag it should be more polished, automatic and offer driver virtualization too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/overview-of-application-virtualization-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-76511</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1356#comment-76511</guid>
		<description>What about MojoPac?  I just tried the trial of their latest enterprise version, and it seems to be able to handle some complex applications pretty well.  Support for the Cisco VPN client seems to be somewhat buggy, but does work.  The interface doesn&#039;t look professional at all, but it does have some interesting enterprise features.

Last time I tried Thinstall, I don&#039;t believe it supported Cisco VPN connectivity, which is a big requirement for me.  It did handle regular applications pretty well, but I only played with it as a trial.

I am definitely looking forward hearing what other people have to say about these applications, as this technology has a lot of potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about MojoPac?  I just tried the trial of their latest enterprise version, and it seems to be able to handle some complex applications pretty well.  Support for the Cisco VPN client seems to be somewhat buggy, but does work.  The interface doesn&#8217;t look professional at all, but it does have some interesting enterprise features.</p>
<p>Last time I tried Thinstall, I don&#8217;t believe it supported Cisco VPN connectivity, which is a big requirement for me.  It did handle regular applications pretty well, but I only played with it as a trial.</p>
<p>I am definitely looking forward hearing what other people have to say about these applications, as this technology has a lot of potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
