<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OmniPeek Personal &#8211; free network monitor, better than Wireshark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/omnipeek-personal-free-network-monitor-better-than-wireshark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/omnipeek-personal-free-network-monitor-better-than-wireshark/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:14:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Nissley</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/omnipeek-personal-free-network-monitor-better-than-wireshark/comment-page-1/#comment-140200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Nissley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/omnipeek-personal-free-network-monitor-better-than-wireshark/#comment-140200</guid>
		<description>I know you posted this a while ago. Looks like OmniPeek Personal is no longer available. And you can&#039;t get to the trial download without submitting your Rolodex (well, not _quite_ that bad). They&#039;re selling OmniPeek Basic (the most limited edition, not as in Rolls Royce Limited Edition) for about $1200!? Think I&#039;ll stick with Wireshark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you posted this a while ago. Looks like OmniPeek Personal is no longer available. And you can&#8217;t get to the trial download without submitting your Rolodex (well, not _quite_ that bad). They&#8217;re selling OmniPeek Basic (the most limited edition, not as in Rolls Royce Limited Edition) for about $1200!? Think I&#8217;ll stick with Wireshark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
