<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New white paper about Internet Explorer 7 deployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-42589</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/#comment-42589</guid>
		<description>Aaron, it really depends on the kind of users you have. To my experience the average web surfer only visits one web site at a time. That’s why they don’t need tabs. Of course, I use tabs. Actually, I use them in IE long before IE7 or Firefox saw the light.

Scribe6, we had similar problems with SSL certificates. The problem often is that you don’t know what kind of web apps your users work with. They are not always installed on your own servers. This is the reason why this upgrade is really tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, it really depends on the kind of users you have. To my experience the average web surfer only visits one web site at a time. That’s why they don’t need tabs. Of course, I use tabs. Actually, I use them in IE long before IE7 or Firefox saw the light.</p>
<p>Scribe6, we had similar problems with SSL certificates. The problem often is that you don’t know what kind of web apps your users work with. They are not always installed on your own servers. This is the reason why this upgrade is really tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scribe6</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-41967</link>
		<dc:creator>Scribe6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/#comment-41967</guid>
		<description>The only reason that most of our line users still have IE 6 is we&#039;ve run into problems with our outside vendors/suppliers (Banking and Travel Agencies) that don&#039;t support IE 7 as of yet.

I know, IE7&#039;s been out a year, as has Vista, and nobody supports it.  Once we&#039;ve got the go ahead from them, we&#039;ll install IE7 for everybody.

You can&#039;t do much about the new machines (unless you&#039;re ordering them with XP SP2) but we have some control over the older stuff.

I, however, wouldn&#039;t go back to IE 6 unless someone paid me to.  I enjoy the tab browsing in Firefox and Opera, but not all the sites worked right due to all of the Active X controls that everything uses.

At the end of the day, this white paper is just another document to read before we do what we do to make sure we don&#039;t break anything significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason that most of our line users still have IE 6 is we&#8217;ve run into problems with our outside vendors/suppliers (Banking and Travel Agencies) that don&#8217;t support IE 7 as of yet.</p>
<p>I know, IE7&#8217;s been out a year, as has Vista, and nobody supports it.  Once we&#8217;ve got the go ahead from them, we&#8217;ll install IE7 for everybody.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t do much about the new machines (unless you&#8217;re ordering them with XP SP2) but we have some control over the older stuff.</p>
<p>I, however, wouldn&#8217;t go back to IE 6 unless someone paid me to.  I enjoy the tab browsing in Firefox and Opera, but not all the sites worked right due to all of the Active X controls that everything uses.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, this white paper is just another document to read before we do what we do to make sure we don&#8217;t break anything significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-41924</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/new-white-paper-about-internet-explorer-7-deployment/#comment-41924</guid>
		<description>95% of my users are on IE7.  They really like the tabbed browsing feature which allows them to keep their desktop less cluttered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95% of my users are on IE7.  They really like the tabbed browsing feature which allows them to keep their desktop less cluttered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
