<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Microsoft Update Catalog only works with Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-21763</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/#comment-21763</guid>
		<description>I switched because IE6 didn’t have a good zoom function. It only worked with some sites. IE7 improved here, but now I am used to some Firefox plugins which are not available for IE. I guess everyone has his own special features. All in all I don’t think that there is a significant difference between Firefox and IE with respect to usability. However, IE is still the standard browser in my organization because it easier to manage. I summarized &lt;a href=&quot;http://4sysops.com/archives/firefox-20-vs-internet-explorer-70-in-a-corporate-network/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IE’s network related features&lt;/a&gt; some time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched because IE6 didn’t have a good zoom function. It only worked with some sites. IE7 improved here, but now I am used to some Firefox plugins which are not available for IE. I guess everyone has his own special features. All in all I don’t think that there is a significant difference between Firefox and IE with respect to usability. However, IE is still the standard browser in my organization because it easier to manage. I summarized <a href="http://4sysops.com/archives/firefox-20-vs-internet-explorer-70-in-a-corporate-network/" rel="nofollow">IE’s network related features</a> some time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-21620</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/new-microsoft-update-catalog-only-works-with-internet-explorer/#comment-21620</guid>
		<description>Well, it is &quot;Microsoft Update Catalog&quot; and you&#039;re looking to update &quot;Microsft Windows&quot;.

That aside, maybe they found it easier or more secure to do with an activex module?

Since I can say I don&#039;t actually &quot;browse
 the internet&quot;, more like &quot;I go to the same few places, the majority of which are tech-related.&quot;,
I&#039;ve been using IE since, umm, Netscape bloated-up (I think that was 4.0) without incident. So, why switch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is &#8220;Microsoft Update Catalog&#8221; and you&#8217;re looking to update &#8220;Microsft Windows&#8221;.</p>
<p>That aside, maybe they found it easier or more secure to do with an activex module?</p>
<p>Since I can say I don&#8217;t actually &#8220;browse<br />
 the internet&#8221;, more like &#8220;I go to the same few places, the majority of which are tech-related.&#8221;,<br />
I&#8217;ve been using IE since, umm, Netscape bloated-up (I think that was 4.0) without incident. So, why switch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
