<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live backup of a virtual machine with Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 using Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sav</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-162355</link>
		<dc:creator>Sav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-162355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using BackupChain for Virtual Server 2005 as well as VMWare. It creates delta incremental files which only contain file changes and takes snapshots while the VMs are running. This way we save a lot of storage space and bandwidth because we send the backups via FTP to another server.
Sav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using BackupChain for Virtual Server 2005 as well as VMWare. It creates delta incremental files which only contain file changes and takes snapshots while the VMs are running. This way we save a lot of storage space and bandwidth because we send the backups via FTP to another server.<br />
Sav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-65428</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-65428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried to run this script on a server running 2005 R2 SP1 and when it runs the actual shadow copy component of the script, I watched it as it saved the state of each VM that was running on the server, not exactly what its supposed to do from how I read the script and article... or is it? 

My question is there anyway now that I&#039;m running SP1 of Virtual Server to do a VSS copy in real time without the servers being &quot;save stated&quot;? 

It was possible prior to SP1 (we did it using a 3rd party tool that did VSS copies) and while I understand the implications of it being like &quot;pressing reset&quot;, this was acceptable to us for an emergency backup/restore scenario as it allowed us to make a backup of the image without having to turn it off.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to run this script on a server running 2005 R2 SP1 and when it runs the actual shadow copy component of the script, I watched it as it saved the state of each VM that was running on the server, not exactly what its supposed to do from how I read the script and article&#8230; or is it? </p>
<p>My question is there anyway now that I&#8217;m running SP1 of Virtual Server to do a VSS copy in real time without the servers being &#8220;save stated&#8221;? </p>
<p>It was possible prior to SP1 (we did it using a 3rd party tool that did VSS copies) and while I understand the implications of it being like &#8220;pressing reset&#8221;, this was acceptable to us for an emergency backup/restore scenario as it allowed us to make a backup of the image without having to turn it off.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveJHU</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-50113</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveJHU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-50113</guid>
		<description>We think we are having success here using Chris Wolf&#039;s (Redmond Mag) script to execute VS Writer to create the snapshot. Question though... 
In Chris&#039; script, he copies the VHD files from the Volume Shadow Copy snapshot to another location, and his backup job backs up that location. Is it okay to just backup from the Volume Shadow Copy snapshot drive directly, instead of first copying the files out of there? We tested that, and restores seem to work. But I&#039;m not sure if there&#039;s something we&#039;re missing that&#039;s a reason why we should copy it first. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We think we are having success here using Chris Wolf&#8217;s (Redmond Mag) script to execute VS Writer to create the snapshot. Question though&#8230;<br />
In Chris&#8217; script, he copies the VHD files from the Volume Shadow Copy snapshot to another location, and his backup job backs up that location. Is it okay to just backup from the Volume Shadow Copy snapshot drive directly, instead of first copying the files out of there? We tested that, and restores seem to work. But I&#8217;m not sure if there&#8217;s something we&#8217;re missing that&#8217;s a reason why we should copy it first. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-38018</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-38018</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to learn if one of them is not bootable.  I may do the same test on my side and will report back if I find anything different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to learn if one of them is not bootable.  I may do the same test on my side and will report back if I find anything different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSea</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-37980</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-37980</guid>
		<description>Not yet, but I&#039;m trying.  I _have_ had Virtual Servers have issues on boot after they were shutdown abrubtly either by host restarts due to power loss, or shutdown (reset or turn off) from the VS console.  However, the difference with the backup script is that its invoking Shadow Copy first on each volume.  We&#039;ve already agreed internally that if I test bringing up virtual backed up servers 20 times (i.e. from 20 different saved machines, not 20 times on the same machine) with NO issues, then we&#039;ll use it on production boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not yet, but I&#8217;m trying.  I _have_ had Virtual Servers have issues on boot after they were shutdown abrubtly either by host restarts due to power loss, or shutdown (reset or turn off) from the VS console.  However, the difference with the backup script is that its invoking Shadow Copy first on each volume.  We&#8217;ve already agreed internally that if I test bringing up virtual backed up servers 20 times (i.e. from 20 different saved machines, not 20 times on the same machine) with NO issues, then we&#8217;ll use it on production boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-37978</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-37978</guid>
		<description>Concur, have you seen any cases where you couldn&#039;t boot the copied virtual server?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concur, have you seen any cases where you couldn&#8217;t boot the copied virtual server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-37921</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-37921</guid>
		<description>My own testing supports your work Trucking Nerd.  Here&#039;s the problem though.  If the state of these &quot;hot backup virtual servers&quot; is indeed the equivalent of pressing the reset button (as indicated by the requirement for giving a reason for the unexpected shutdown), and if booting from a VM saved in this manner results in failure 1 time in 20, that&#039;s 1 time too many.

And Computer Mischief - the backup systems you mention aren&#039;t anything close to the same as backing up virtual machines from the outside.  You can&#039;t even compare them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own testing supports your work Trucking Nerd.  Here&#8217;s the problem though.  If the state of these &#8220;hot backup virtual servers&#8221; is indeed the equivalent of pressing the reset button (as indicated by the requirement for giving a reason for the unexpected shutdown), and if booting from a VM saved in this manner results in failure 1 time in 20, that&#8217;s 1 time too many.</p>
<p>And Computer Mischief &#8211; the backup systems you mention aren&#8217;t anything close to the same as backing up virtual machines from the outside.  You can&#8217;t even compare them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-37442</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-37442</guid>
		<description>Hmm, IT Commando, that has a nice ring to it :)

I&#039;m very satisfied with what I&#039;ve seen of the script and am rolling it out in my testbed now and fairly certain it will make it to my production environment before much longer.  

I also enjoy these discussions and collaboration...the synergies formed from the collective are invaluable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, IT Commando, that has a nice ring to it <img src='http://4sysops.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m very satisfied with what I&#8217;ve seen of the script and am rolling it out in my testbed now and fairly certain it will make it to my production environment before much longer.  </p>
<p>I also enjoy these discussions and collaboration&#8230;the synergies formed from the collective are invaluable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComputerMischief</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-37440</link>
		<dc:creator>ComputerMischief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-37440</guid>
		<description>I love these discussions.  On the one hand you have the IT Commando forging ahead proving time and time again that backing up a live Virtual Machine without suspending it first and all that happens is that Windows OS complains it wasn&#039;t shutdown correctly as a flag wasn&#039;t set to say that it was.

On the other hand you have the nervous &quot;but it does&#039;nt back up what is currently in memory&quot; therfore is not consistent.  I beg to differ as Symantec Netbackup, Backup exec, Brightstor blah,blah clients do not do this either.  They capture the system state information which isn&#039;t superior, a mere collection of necessary systems bits and bobs inc registry, iis, boot info, com and dcom stuff etc, etc 

The point is a Commando IT engineer in a High availability environment, now has the ability to restore an entire machine in a couple of relatively hastle free minutes (When using disk staging) and without the complaints of VPN users that decide that midnight is the best time of day for them to work.

Suspending every server for a short period every night might suit some, BUT who can actually say that in a server farm of 20 + servers all suspend + backup + unsuspend in 5-20 minutes, a little hopeful I feel.  Plus what about when the thing gets stuck as you have to answer questions to get it going again.

I am not fond of being lynched when I walk in in the morning as there is only 1st line IT Support where I work.

Although of Course the IT Commando is a dead man if the server being backed up generates so much IO that the Volumes become corrupted (I have never seen this though).  I have seen mild issue which are resolved by chkntfs /f,  as during the backup data does change which leaves the ntfs bitmap a little confused as to where some files went and where these new ones came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these discussions.  On the one hand you have the IT Commando forging ahead proving time and time again that backing up a live Virtual Machine without suspending it first and all that happens is that Windows OS complains it wasn&#8217;t shutdown correctly as a flag wasn&#8217;t set to say that it was.</p>
<p>On the other hand you have the nervous &#8220;but it does&#8217;nt back up what is currently in memory&#8221; therfore is not consistent.  I beg to differ as Symantec Netbackup, Backup exec, Brightstor blah,blah clients do not do this either.  They capture the system state information which isn&#8217;t superior, a mere collection of necessary systems bits and bobs inc registry, iis, boot info, com and dcom stuff etc, etc </p>
<p>The point is a Commando IT engineer in a High availability environment, now has the ability to restore an entire machine in a couple of relatively hastle free minutes (When using disk staging) and without the complaints of VPN users that decide that midnight is the best time of day for them to work.</p>
<p>Suspending every server for a short period every night might suit some, BUT who can actually say that in a server farm of 20 + servers all suspend + backup + unsuspend in 5-20 minutes, a little hopeful I feel.  Plus what about when the thing gets stuck as you have to answer questions to get it going again.</p>
<p>I am not fond of being lynched when I walk in in the morning as there is only 1st line IT Support where I work.</p>
<p>Although of Course the IT Commando is a dead man if the server being backed up generates so much IO that the Volumes become corrupted (I have never seen this though).  I have seen mild issue which are resolved by chkntfs /f,  as during the backup data does change which leaves the ntfs bitmap a little confused as to where some files went and where these new ones came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-36207</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-36207</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how the file isn&#039;t being triggered, but somehow the changes I made in all of my testing I have done so far have been ported over, i also observed the same date / time stamp as you have. Maybe the date / time stamps are only tickled when the file physical grows (or shrinks).  I&#039;d be interested to see if you yield any different results from any additional tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the file isn&#8217;t being triggered, but somehow the changes I made in all of my testing I have done so far have been ported over, i also observed the same date / time stamp as you have. Maybe the date / time stamps are only tickled when the file physical grows (or shrinks).  I&#8217;d be interested to see if you yield any different results from any additional tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-36204</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-36204</guid>
		<description>I ran the Redmond Mag script on a production server for a week, and the other thing that scared me was that EVERY VHD backup had the same date and time stamp as the original VHD.  A virtual machine file&#039;s data and time stamps only change when it is shutdown or saved.  How can it be that data INSIDE the file is changing but the VHD isn&#039;t?  It boggles me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran the Redmond Mag script on a production server for a week, and the other thing that scared me was that EVERY VHD backup had the same date and time stamp as the original VHD.  A virtual machine file&#8217;s data and time stamps only change when it is shutdown or saved.  How can it be that data INSIDE the file is changing but the VHD isn&#8217;t?  It boggles me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-36202</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-36202</guid>
		<description>5) was exactly the behaviour that was scaring me out of using the RedmondMag script.  Your testing indicates to me that this might be worth while, so I won&#039;t completely abandon my efforts.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5) was exactly the behaviour that was scaring me out of using the RedmondMag script.  Your testing indicates to me that this might be worth while, so I won&#8217;t completely abandon my efforts.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-36199</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-36199</guid>
		<description>Bullet, I&#039;ve done more testing with this redmon script and I&#039;m very pleased. Here is what I did:

1) With my already running virtual server, I went to SQL Server, created a new table, inserted a couple rows into it.
2) immediately after this I went to start the redmonmag script on this virtual machine.  The virtual machine was up 100% while this was running in the background.
3) when the script was done, I copied the virtual machine files over to another machine.
4) I did an add on the second virtual server to add these backed up files.
5) started it up, it was not in a saved state, it booted up and asked me for a reason for the unexpected previous shutdown.
6) I logged into SQL and my table was there and so were my records.  

So All looks good in this scenario.  I guess the DML and DDL I issued get written down to the SQL Log file immediately..I wasn&#039;t sure if it took a while for the disk changes to make it down to the VHD, but at any rate, all of my transactions that were committed at the time of the script execution made it to copied server.  So far I can&#039;t find any negatives for this script.  I wonder if what the guest OS is makes a difference?  I&#039;m running W2k3 Server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullet, I&#8217;ve done more testing with this redmon script and I&#8217;m very pleased. Here is what I did:</p>
<p>1) With my already running virtual server, I went to SQL Server, created a new table, inserted a couple rows into it.<br />
2) immediately after this I went to start the redmonmag script on this virtual machine.  The virtual machine was up 100% while this was running in the background.<br />
3) when the script was done, I copied the virtual machine files over to another machine.<br />
4) I did an add on the second virtual server to add these backed up files.<br />
5) started it up, it was not in a saved state, it booted up and asked me for a reason for the unexpected previous shutdown.<br />
6) I logged into SQL and my table was there and so were my records.  </p>
<p>So All looks good in this scenario.  I guess the DML and DDL I issued get written down to the SQL Log file immediately..I wasn&#8217;t sure if it took a while for the disk changes to make it down to the VHD, but at any rate, all of my transactions that were committed at the time of the script execution made it to copied server.  So far I can&#8217;t find any negatives for this script.  I wonder if what the guest OS is makes a difference?  I&#8217;m running W2k3 Server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigF</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35889</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35889</guid>
		<description>One of the shortcomings of the various published scripts is that they only support snapping a single volume at a time. If your VM&#039;s have VHD&#039;s stored on multiple volumes (as ours do) then I think you&#039;ll find you need to snap all the relevant volumes simultaneously eg:

vshadow.exe -p -script=setvar1.cmd %Vol1% %Vol2% %Vol3%

I haven&#039;t had time to fully test this theory yet, but I wonder whether this may explain why some people have had problems running the scripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the shortcomings of the various published scripts is that they only support snapping a single volume at a time. If your VM&#8217;s have VHD&#8217;s stored on multiple volumes (as ours do) then I think you&#8217;ll find you need to snap all the relevant volumes simultaneously eg:</p>
<p>vshadow.exe -p -script=setvar1.cmd %Vol1% %Vol2% %Vol3%</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had time to fully test this theory yet, but I wonder whether this may explain why some people have had problems running the scripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35829</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35829</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the additional links, will scope these out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the additional links, will scope these out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35797</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not using the script at Redmond Mag.  I tried it, and my own testing revealed that it simply does not work as advertised in the article.

The vshadow.exe utility doesn&#039;t actually interface with Virtual Server.  It just snapshots the disk volume on the host.  In Microsoft&#039;s own documentation, they say that the backup solution must be Virtual Server aware in order to work (as indicated in the article above), and vshadow isn&#039;t.

The script _I_ use is a slight modification of this one:

http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1156&amp;ScriptType=vbscript

There&#039;s a less complex version of the above script linked in the Redmond Mag article (here if you are interested: http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1049&amp;ScriptType=vbscript).  If you look at the script Chris Wolf wrote, its basically the same script with the Virtual Server suspend/restore logic stripped out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not using the script at Redmond Mag.  I tried it, and my own testing revealed that it simply does not work as advertised in the article.</p>
<p>The vshadow.exe utility doesn&#8217;t actually interface with Virtual Server.  It just snapshots the disk volume on the host.  In Microsoft&#8217;s own documentation, they say that the backup solution must be Virtual Server aware in order to work (as indicated in the article above), and vshadow isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The script _I_ use is a slight modification of this one:</p>
<p><a href="http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1156&amp;ScriptType=vbscript" rel="nofollow">http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1156&amp;ScriptType=vbscript</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a less complex version of the above script linked in the Redmond Mag article (here if you are interested: <a href="http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1049&amp;ScriptType=vbscript)" rel="nofollow">http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1049&amp;ScriptType=vbscript)</a>.  If you look at the script Chris Wolf wrote, its basically the same script with the Virtual Server suspend/restore logic stripped out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35792</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35792</guid>
		<description>The script at redmondmag does not suspend the virutal server, it relies on the VSS writers which is why I am excited to use it.  Are you saying that you used it and saw the virtual machine change states while it was running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The script at redmondmag does not suspend the virutal server, it relies on the VSS writers which is why I am excited to use it.  Are you saying that you used it and saw the virtual machine change states while it was running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35788</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35788</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using scripts like this in production for about a year.  The difference being that they suspend the virtual machine, take the snapshot, and then resume it.  There&#039;s anywhere from 30 seconds to 5 minutes of downtime depending on the size of the VM.

If I ended up with a customer that ran 24/7, I guess that would be a reason to use Data Protection Manager.  Or just do the backup during shift change. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using scripts like this in production for about a year.  The difference being that they suspend the virtual machine, take the snapshot, and then resume it.  There&#8217;s anywhere from 30 seconds to 5 minutes of downtime depending on the size of the VM.</p>
<p>If I ended up with a customer that ran 24/7, I guess that would be a reason to use Data Protection Manager.  Or just do the backup during shift change. <img src='http://4sysops.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trucking Nerd</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35780</link>
		<dc:creator>Trucking Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35780</guid>
		<description>I had done this when I did my test because I wasn&#039;t sure of the state the copied files would be in when I started that VM up on another machine.  Interesting enough, it was not in a saved state, so it was like the machine was just starting up, however as mentioned previousl my changed file was changed and the state of the VM during the shadow copy was not altered or suspended, so it was a live backup, somewhat consistent. 

My conclusion was anything in memory and not written to disk will be discarded.  This could have an impact on SQL and on Exchange.  I guess it would be interesting to learn more about this script, I hope to use it in our production environment for backing up some of our virtual servers, would love to hear others thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had done this when I did my test because I wasn&#8217;t sure of the state the copied files would be in when I started that VM up on another machine.  Interesting enough, it was not in a saved state, so it was like the machine was just starting up, however as mentioned previousl my changed file was changed and the state of the VM during the shadow copy was not altered or suspended, so it was a live backup, somewhat consistent. </p>
<p>My conclusion was anything in memory and not written to disk will be discarded.  This could have an impact on SQL and on Exchange.  I guess it would be interesting to learn more about this script, I hope to use it in our production environment for backing up some of our virtual servers, would love to hear others thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BulletproofSean</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/comment-page-1/#comment-35728</link>
		<dc:creator>BulletproofSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/life-backup-of-a-virtual-machine-with-virtual-server-2005-r2-sp1-using-volume-shadow-copy-service-vss/#comment-35728</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry about file sizes, what about time and date stamps on the VHD and VSV files?

Are you certain that the virtual machine isn&#039;t first being suspended and then restored?  I&#039;ve seen some cases where, even if not being specifically put to sleep, that this was happening. Usually with virtual machines that were originally created in earlier (pre SP1) versions of Virtual Server.

Try this:  Start up some programs and leave them running.  Perform the backup.  When you restore to the backed up images are the programs still running?

If not, that (to me) is not a transactionally consistent backup, and unless someone proves otherwise I wouldn&#039;t think that Exchange and SQL databases are being handled correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry about file sizes, what about time and date stamps on the VHD and VSV files?</p>
<p>Are you certain that the virtual machine isn&#8217;t first being suspended and then restored?  I&#8217;ve seen some cases where, even if not being specifically put to sleep, that this was happening. Usually with virtual machines that were originally created in earlier (pre SP1) versions of Virtual Server.</p>
<p>Try this:  Start up some programs and leave them running.  Perform the backup.  When you restore to the backed up images are the programs still running?</p>
<p>If not, that (to me) is not a transactionally consistent backup, and unless someone proves otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t think that Exchange and SQL databases are being handled correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
