<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Vista less secure than Windows 2000? How the Vista bashing industry works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/comment-page-1/#comment-69321</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1284#comment-69321</guid>
		<description>Leonardo, I agree that most Windows 2000 systems are in the corporate world. But I doubt that many companies use the PC Tools software. Malware protection that is based on heuristics will keep admins busy all day.

Chumplet, I think it is possible that one computer can trigger more than one alarm, which explains this 102%. But this number is unbelievably high, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leonardo, I agree that most Windows 2000 systems are in the corporate world. But I doubt that many companies use the PC Tools software. Malware protection that is based on heuristics will keep admins busy all day.</p>
<p>Chumplet, I think it is possible that one computer can trigger more than one alarm, which explains this 102%. But this number is unbelievably high, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chumplet</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/comment-page-1/#comment-68631</link>
		<dc:creator>chumplet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1284#comment-68631</guid>
		<description>am i also to assume from the data that 102% of xp machines are infected?  what a jopke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i also to assume from the data that 102% of xp machines are infected?  what a jopke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITsVISTA Web Link: 4sysops - Is Vista less secure than Windows 2000? How the Vista bashing industry works &#124; ITsVISTA</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/comment-page-1/#comment-68598</link>
		<dc:creator>ITsVISTA Web Link: 4sysops - Is Vista less secure than Windows 2000? How the Vista bashing industry works &#124; ITsVISTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1284#comment-68598</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael&#8217;s views on how widespread Vista bashing is, using the recent &#8216;Windows 2000 is safer&#8217; hoopla as an example. See the original post at: 4sysops - Is Vista less secure than Windows 2000? How the Vista bashing industry works [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael&#8217;s views on how widespread Vista bashing is, using the recent &#8216;Windows 2000 is safer&#8217; hoopla as an example. See the original post at: 4sysops &#8211; Is Vista less secure than Windows 2000? How the Vista bashing industry works [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/is-vista-less-secure-than-windows-2000-how-the-vista-bashing-industry-works/comment-page-1/#comment-68584</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/?p=1284#comment-68584</guid>
		<description>According to the &quot;data&quot; quoted, Vista is 1.5 times more secure than XP. A quick google on the subject yields two things: a load of &quot;Vista more secure than XP&quot;/&quot;Vista less secure than XP&quot; drivel and a hearty laugh.
I presume that the only Windows 2000 systems left are in the corporate world and are locked down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the &#8220;data&#8221; quoted, Vista is 1.5 times more secure than XP. A quick google on the subject yields two things: a load of &#8220;Vista more secure than XP&#8221;/&#8221;Vista less secure than XP&#8221; drivel and a hearty laugh.<br />
I presume that the only Windows 2000 systems left are in the corporate world and are locked down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
