<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPSec isolation for the KMS (Key Management Service)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/comment-page-1/#comment-14216</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/#comment-14216</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I think many are not yet aware of this. There was a discussion going on if we should install one KMS for our whole university. We have about 40,000 students and the University buildings are spread out all over the city. Everyone can step in those buildings. So this KMS would probably be a big Windows Vista activation center for the whole city. So my first thought was this is simply impossible. But on second thought, why not? I think, weâ€™ll have such â€œpublic Vista activation centersâ€? soon everywhere because public institutions canâ€™t often control who has access to their networks. Microsoft should find a better solution soon. Securing a KMS host with IPsec is too complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/comment-page-1/#comment-14070</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/ipsec-isolation-for-the-kms-key-management-service/#comment-14070</guid>
		<description>Wow, a very interesting topic that I doubt anyone on our campus has pondered yet. I would agree with your point about breaking your back to protect the licenses. If Microsoft didn&#039;t provide a tool to make it practical, then they&#039;ve expressed the amount of importance they put on the &#039;problem&#039;. Do keep us all informed on what direction you go in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a very interesting topic that I doubt anyone on our campus has pondered yet. I would agree with your point about breaking your back to protect the licenses. If Microsoft didn&#8217;t provide a tool to make it practical, then they&#8217;ve expressed the amount of importance they put on the &#8216;problem&#8217;. Do keep us all informed on what direction you go in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
