<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to Continuous Data Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/</link>
	<description>For Windows Administrators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:37:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-12651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/#comment-12651</guid>
		<description>Actually, I would disagree, too. It works, but I wouldn’t say that it works flawlessly. Since Veritas bought Backup Exec, it never really worked without any problems. I think, it even got worse when Symantec bought Veritas. I still remember the times when Backup Exec was owned by Seagate. At that time, it was really a great backup tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I would disagree, too. It works, but I wouldn’t say that it works flawlessly. Since Veritas bought Backup Exec, it never really worked without any problems. I think, it even got worse when Symantec bought Veritas. I still remember the times when Backup Exec was owned by Seagate. At that time, it was really a great backup tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Muir</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-12643</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/#comment-12643</guid>
		<description>There are others posting here who would disagree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are others posting here who would disagree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>You heard wrong. I&#039;ve been using it since release and it works flawlessly. Minor issues here and there, but nothing to scream at, and EVERY software application, upon release, has &#039;issues&#039; to speak of. Granular restore capability is awesome. Stability is great. Alternative solutions? Sure. NTBackup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You heard wrong. I&#8217;ve been using it since release and it works flawlessly. Minor issues here and there, but nothing to scream at, and EVERY software application, upon release, has &#8216;issues&#8217; to speak of. Granular restore capability is awesome. Stability is great. Alternative solutions? Sure. NTBackup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Muir</title>
		<link>http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-11350</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4sysops.com/archives/introduction-to-continuous-data-protection/#comment-11350</guid>
		<description>Pulling my hair out with backup exec. I hear that the new 11d version sucks even harder than 10d. Any alternative solutions to recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulling my hair out with backup exec. I hear that the new 11d version sucks even harder than 10d. Any alternative solutions to recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
