Comments on: Does server virtualization reduce costs? Part III – Software and payroll costs http://4sysops.com/archives/does-server-virtualization-reduce-costs-part-iii-software-and-payroll-costs/ For Windows Administrators Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:58:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Does server virtualization reduce costs? | Windows Server 2008 blog http://4sysops.com/archives/does-server-virtualization-reduce-costs-part-iii-software-and-payroll-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-103268 Does server virtualization reduce costs? | Windows Server 2008 blog Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:25:03 +0000 http://4sysops.com/?p=1536#comment-103268 [...] Does server virtualization reduce costs? Part III - Software and payroll costs [...] [...] Does server virtualization reduce costs? Part III – Software and payroll costs [...]

]]> By: Michael http://4sysops.com/archives/does-server-virtualization-reduce-costs-part-iii-software-and-payroll-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-99477 Michael Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:43:12 +0000 http://4sysops.com/?p=1536#comment-99477 Oh really. I always thought IBM is so proud of its blade servers. Do you know this ad where the coffee guy just installs a blade server within a second or so? ;-) The worst rackmount kits I have ever seen are the ones from Fujitsu-Siemens. Oh really. I always thought IBM is so proud of its blade servers. Do you know this ad where the coffee guy just installs a blade server within a second or so? ;-) The worst rackmount kits I have ever seen are the ones from Fujitsu-Siemens.

]]> By: Lukas Beeler http://4sysops.com/archives/does-server-virtualization-reduce-costs-part-iii-software-and-payroll-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-99472 Lukas Beeler Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:27:20 +0000 http://4sysops.com/?p=1536#comment-99472 <i>you do not need Einsteins to do this kind of work</i> I guess you've never seen one of IBMs more exotic rackmount kits (I'm looking at you, System i 515). you do not need Einsteins to do this kind of work

I guess you’ve never seen one of IBMs more exotic rackmount kits (I’m looking at you, System i 515).

]]>